Creating a Will is crucial to ensuring your wishes are upheld and your family is provided for when you pass away. Usually, there is a significant period of time between creating a Will and your estate being passed on, which means that circumstances can change and life events can occur which can alter its validity or mean that you need to update it.

In this blog, Kacy Porter, trainee solicitor, outlines six events which could impact your Will and highlights the importance of reviewing it regularly to ensure it continues to reflect your current wishes.

Getting married or entering a civil partnership

In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, getting married automatically invalidates any Will that you may have previously made. The only exception to this is if your Will was explicitly made in contemplation of the marriage.

Whilst it may not be a top priority for newlyweds, it is advisable to create a new Will as soon as possible after marriage to ensure your new wishes are in writing. Alternatively, engaged couples can make a Will in contemplation of marriage, so that it does not become void and there is no time period in which their wishes are not protected.

If you do not create a new Will, the original beneficiaries (individuals due to receive gifts) could be left with nothing if you pass away. The law will decide who inherits your estate under intestacy rules.

Divorce or dissolution of marriage

Whilst divorce does not fully revoke your Will, it does invalidate any gifts to your former spouse – they will no longer be able to benefit from your Will or act as an executor or trustee. This means that if your spouse was the sole beneficiary named in your Will, they will be treated as though they have died and the law will decide how the estate is distributed.

It’s important to note that a separation does not have the same impact on a Will as a divorce. If you are separated, your spouse is still entitled to inherit whatever is detailed in your existing Will.

As a result, updating your Will following either a divorce or separation is crucial to ensuring that your estate is passed on to the right people.

Death of a beneficiary or executor

Following the loss of a loved one, updating your Will is unlikely to be front of mind. However, if this loved one was a beneficiary and/or executor of your Will, you will need to make changes to ensure your wishes are upheld. If an executor passes away before you, you can appoint a new executor and update your existing Will accordingly. You can appoint up to four executors in your Will and it is a good idea to have more than one, should this circumstance arise. If you were to die without an executor, your estate would go through probate.

Should a beneficiary pass away, their gift usually becomes void and their share is redistributed to the remaining beneficiaries. You can update your Will to redirect the share, or you can leave instructions within it (a substitution clause) to say where you would like the gift to go in the event that a beneficiary dies. If a child dies before receiving the inheritance left to them by their parent, it may be passed on to the child’s surviving children.

Moving abroad or owning overseas assets

Different countries have different laws, meaning that a Will made in the UK may not be valid overseas. If you move abroad or purchase a property in a different country, you may need separate Wills to protect your assets in multiple jurisdictions. For example, in some countries, there are heirship laws which require you to leave a percentage of your assets to protected heirs, such as your spouse or children. A UK Will may not align with these rules, causing issues if you would like to distribute your assets to others. 

Whether your Will is valid overseas depends on a variety of factors, including the laws and inheritance rules of specific countries, meaning that specialist legal advice is required to ensure all assets are covered.

Birth of a child or grandchild

The arrival of a new addition to the family is the perfect opportunity to review your Will. Although a child or grandchild won’t have any automatic impact on your Will, you may wish to add them as a beneficiary or reconsider how your assets will be divided now that there is another family member to consider. You can also nominate who you would like to care for your child or children in the event of your passing, by appointing a guardian who is named in the Will.

Change in financial circumstances

Whilst a change in wealth will not invalidate your Will, a significant boost from inheritance, selling a business or winning the lottery does warrant a review of what your beneficiaries will receive. There may also be inheritance tax implementations associated with the increased estate value, prompting a review of tax planning strategies.

On the other hand, if your level of wealth reduces, or you sell an asset which you intended to gift to a beneficiary, these changes will need to be reflected in an updated Will.

Protecting your wishes

Amidst significant life events like marriage, divorce or the loss of a loved one, reviewing and updating your Will can easily be forgotten. However, these changes can have a significant impact on whether or not your wishes are upheld when you pass away. Taking the time to ensure your Will evolves with you means that your loved ones will receive what you wish them to when the time comes.

We recommend reviewing your Will at least every five years, or in the wake of any big life milestones or changes, providing you with peace of mind that it accurately reflects your current wishes.

At Hill and Company, we’re the law firm for life. Our team understand that circumstances change and your Will should change with them. If you’d like help with a new Will, updating an existing one, or you’d simply like some advice, get in touch with our experts today.

If you’ve been thinking about starting the search for your first home, this year could be a prime opportunity to get on the property ladder. First-time buyers currently have a growing number of low-deposit mortgages to choose from, alongside schemes to support them in taking the next step.

Purchasing your first property is exciting, but it can also feel daunting. There are significant, hard-saved sums of money involved, and lots of jargon when it comes to the paperwork, meaning many first-time buyers are unclear on the process and can skip over important considerations when purchasing their first home.

Here, our trainee solicitor Charles Barrand outlines three factors for first-time buyers to consider and breaks down some terms that can often cause confusion.

Leasehold or freehold – what’s the difference?

When searching for a property, it’s important to be clear on the difference between leasehold and freehold. A freehold means you own the property and land outright and indefinitely. With a leasehold, you own it for a fixed period of time and a freeholder owns the land. Many flats are leasehold, with annual service charges and ground rent payable to the owner of the building the apartment is in. A lot of houses are freehold, but this isn’t always the case.

Before purchasing a leasehold property, make sure that you’ve accounted for any additional charges, any future increases, and considered how many years are left on the lease. Often, a leasehold will be anywhere from 90 to 999 years, so it’s unlikely to end during the time you live in the property, but it’s always important to make sure, as it can impact your mortgage and the resale value. If you’re planning to make any significant changes to the property, you’ll usually need the landlord’s permission.

Legal ownership: joint tenants vs tenants in common

Another key consideration for any buyer is how the property will be owned. As joint tenants, you own the whole property together, which means that if it’s sold, both owners receive an equal share. Under a joint tenancy, if the co-owner passes away, their interest in the property automatically transfers to the surviving co-owner. As a result, this form of ownership is common with spouses and long-term partners, as well as those contributing equally to the property purchase.

Alternatively, tenants in common own individual, unequal shares of the property. This is often preferred by siblings, business partners or friends purchasing a property together, or by those who want to protect their individual financial contribution. If you and your co-purchaser are contributing unequally to the deposit, this should be recorded in a legal deed called a Declaration of Trust, which your solicitor can prepare at the time of purchase.

As tenants in common, each owner’s share of the property forms part of their estate and passes in accordance with their Will; it doesn’t automatically transfer to the co-owner.

The decision you make can have a lasting impact, so if you’re not sure which ownership option is best suited to your circumstances, our expert team can help you to decide.

Financing your purchase: ensuring you can cover the costs

Many first-time buyers use Help to Buy or Lifetime ISAs to boost their deposits and benefit from the additional government contributions. However, they do make the process more complex and time-consuming, which is reflected in a small increase in the legal fees.

Other circumstances, such as buying a leasehold property or requiring a Declaration of Trust, can also increase legal costs, so ensure that you have budgeted for these before making the decision to move forward with your house purchase. Additionally, the conveyancing process for a new build property can differ significantly, due to additional checks, developer involvement and tighter timelines, which can incur higher costs.

Whilst reaching your deposit goal is a major milestone, it’s also important to account for costs associated with surveys, mortgage fees (if applicable), moving and insurance, alongside conveyancing costs, to ensure you have enough left over to cover these expenses. First-time buyers in England don’t pay Stamp Duty on homes up to £300,000, but if the property you’re purchasing is over this amount (up to £500,000), you’ll need to pay a reduced rate of 5%. If the property is over £500,000, you won’t qualify for first-time buyers’ relief.

Expert guidance to get you on the property ladder

At Hill and Company, we know that buying your first property is no small feat. We take the time to explain the process at the outset, outlining what happens when, so you know what to expect from us and the timescales involved in getting you the keys to your new home.

If you’re ready to step onto the property ladder, get in touch to find out how we can help you.

January is often described as “divorce month”. Year after year, it is one of the busiest times for enquiries about separation and divorce. This is rarely because something suddenly goes wrong in January. More often, the Christmas period acts as a pressure point – long periods at home, family expectations, financial strain and the emotional weight of the season can bring long-standing issues into sharper focus. When the new year arrives, many people begin asking themselves difficult but honest questions about the future.

If you are finding yourself doing the same, you are not alone. Deciding whether a marriage has reached its end is never an easy conclusion to come to. For most people, it follows months or even years of uncertainty. Emotions tend to run high, and it can be hard to know what to think about first, let alone what to do.

Having advised clients who are exactly at this point for years, here are some important things to consider:

Start by getting a handle on the finances

When everything feels unsettled, understanding your financial position can bring an unexpected sense of stability. You do not need to have every answer immediately, but it helps to begin pulling together a picture of what there is: property, savings, pensions, investments, income and liabilities. It is equally important to understand what life actually costs – not just on paper, but in reality.

In many marriages, finances are divided along practical lines and one spouse may not have full visibility of everything. That is particularly common where there are business interests, trusts or substantial investments. Getting clarity early helps avoid unpleasant surprises later and allows sensible decisions to be made from an informed position.

Speaking to a family solicitor at this stage is not a commitment to divorce. It is simply a way of understanding where you stand, what a fair outcome might look like and how the process usually unfolds if you decide to proceed.

Be honest about what really matters to you

One of the most useful exercises we encourage clients to do early on is to think carefully about their priorities. Divorce can feel like a loss of control, but knowing what matters most to you helps bring focus back into the process.

For some people, their overriding concern is their children. Whether that be preserving day-to-day routines or focusing on particular schooling options. For others, it may be staying in the family home, achieving financial independence, or ensuring they are not disadvantaged later in life, particularly when it comes to pensions.

There is no right or wrong answer. What matters is clarity. Once your priorities are clear, your legal advice and approach can be shaped around them.

Keep communication measured, where possible

Not every separation can be amicable, and sometimes firm boundaries are essential. But where there is scope for calm and respectful communication, it can make an enormous difference both emotionally and financially.

Early conversations about practical arrangements, particularly for children, can help avoid misunderstandings and reduce conflict. In many cases, mediation or other forms of structured discussion allow couples to reach sensible agreements without the stress of court proceedings. These processes are about finding workable solutions that allow everyone to move forward without the context of costly court proceedings.

For some couples, it may not be possible to have constructive direct discussions. This does not necessarily mean that court proceedings are required. The introduction of specialists such as solicitors or mediators can help resolve disputes without contested proceedings.

If children are involved, how and when they are told about the separation also deserves careful thought. Parents often underestimate how much children take their emotional cues from them. A considered, united approach, even where the relationship itself is ending, can provide important reassurance.

Make sure you are supported

Divorce is a legal process, but it is also a deeply personal one. Having the right people around you matters. That may be professional support, such as a therapist or counsellor, or simply trusted friends and family who can listen without judgement.

From a legal perspective, good advice should feel supportive as well as robust. An experienced family solicitor will not only protect your position but will help you think ahead, anticipate difficulties and make decisions that stand the test of time.

At Hill and Company, we’re the law firm for life. We understand the emotional toll that a divorce can have, and our dedicated family law solicitors take a personal, sensitive approach, working with you to secure the best outcome so you can look to the future with clarity and confidence.

Get in touch today to find out how we can help.

When buying property with another person, one of the first and most important decisions you will need to consider is how the property will be owned. In the England and Wales, property can be owned as either joint tenants or tenants in common. 

Both types of property ownership have distinct legal and practical consequences, especially when it comes to future finances, inheritance, and flexibility. Choosing the right type of ownership at the outset can help avoid future disputes or complications and ensure your wishes are followed.

Joint Tenants

Under a joint tenancy, all owners are considered to own the whole property together, rather than holding individual and defined shares. This is the case even if one party has contributed more to the purchase price. Therefore, on sale it is presumed that each owner will receive an equal share.

Another important implication of joint tenancy is the right of survivorship. This means that if one co-owner passes away, their interest in the property automatically transfers to the surviving co-owner(s). This arrangement can simplify inheritance matters, as the property passes directly to the surviving owner(s). However, it also removes the ability to leave your share of the property to someone else in your will. 

For this reason, joint tenancy is common among spouses and long-term partners who want certainty, simplicity, and security in the event of one partner’s death. Joint tenancy can also be appropriate where purchasers are contributing equally to the property.

Tenants in Common

By contrast, a tenancy in common provides greater flexibility. Under a tenancy in common, each co-owner can hold a distinct and potentially unequal share of the property. For example, one owner may hold 70% while the other holds 30%.  

Where purchasers are contributing unequally, it is often appropriate to record the ownership proportions in a Declaration of Trust, which is a legal deed prepared at the time of purchase.

Unlike joint tenancy, there is no right of survivorship where the property is held as tenants in common. Instead, each owner’s share will form part of their estate and passes according to their will or, if no will exists, under the rules of intestacy. This allows co-owners the ability to make provision for the share of the property they hold in their will, offering more freedom in estate planning.

Tenancy in common is often preferred by purchasers who are friends, siblings, or business partners buying property together, as well as by individuals who want their financial contributions clearly reflected in ownership shares.

Things to Consider Before Deciding

When deciding which ownership type is right for you, it is important to think carefully about your circumstances and long-term plans:

• Future planning – Do you want your share to automatically pass to the co-owner, or would you prefer control over who inherits it?
• Financial contributions – If you are contributing unequally to the purchase price, a tenancy in common allows the shares you hold the property in to reflect this.
• Relationship dynamics – Couples often choose a joint tenancy for simplicity, while unrelated buyers may prefer a tenancy in common for flexibility. However, the best choice will depend on your personal circumstances.

Conclusion

Choosing between joint tenancy and tenancy in common is more than a formality, it can have lasting implications for inheritance, future control, and financial planning. 

Before you decide, it’s wise to seek legal advice from your conveyancer to ensure the ownership structure matches your individual circumstances.

If you are planning to purchase a property with another person and would like to explore your options or discuss these issues in further detail, please contact our experienced conveyancing department today on 0161 928 3201.

When a relationship breaks down, not every couple is ready (or willing) to proceed straight to divorce. For many, the immediate priority is achieving stability: knowing where you stand financially, how property will be managed, and what arrangements will be in place for children. A separation agreement can provide exactly that, a clear, structured framework to help both parties move forward with confidence.

What is a separation agreement?

A separation agreement is a written contract that sets out how separating partners intend to manage finances, property, and responsibilities such as childcare. While it is not legally binding in the same way as a court order, the courts will generally give weight to such agreements if they are fair, entered into voluntarily, and supported by full financial disclosure and independent legal advice.

Why separation agreements matter

One of the main advantages of a separation agreement is the clarity it brings. At a time when emotions can run high and uncertainty can feel overwhelming, having a written record of what has been agreed helps reduce the scope for conflict and provides stability for both parties.

By setting out arrangements privately, couples can often save considerable time, expense, and stress. This not only makes the process smoother but also allows both parties to maintain greater control over the outcome.

A carefully drafted agreement can also ensure that assets, debts, and any ongoing maintenance are clearly defined, reducing the risk of disputes arising later. This level of detail can be particularly important where there are complex financial arrangements or significant assets involved.

For couples with children, separation agreements can also provide reassurance by recording practical parenting arrangements. From child contact schedules to shared responsibilities, these provisions offer structure and support for families navigating a period of transition.

Who should consider one?

Separation agreement are not only for married couples who are not yet ready to start divorce proceedings. Whilst they are certainly available and may be beneficial to such individuals, cohabiting partners with shared assets or financial responsibilities may utilise separation agreements as a means of formalising what may otherwise be informal ‘kitchen table’ discussions.

The importance of legal advice

Courts will look closely at how a separation agreement was made, especially if it is later relied upon during divorce proceedings or financial claims. The importance of obtaining legal advice cannot be understated. As practitioners we are often asked to ‘resolve’ problems later down the line which may have otherwise been prevented with proactive action from the start. Taking these steps early not only protects your financial position but also provides peace of mind as you move into the next chapter of your life.

How we can help

At Hill and Company Solicitors, our specialist matrimonial team provide practical, compassionate advice tailored to your circumstances. Whether you are looking for a short-term solution or a stepping stone toward a more permanent arrangement, we can help you decide whether a separation agreement is the right option for you.

If you are separating (or even just considering your options) contact our experienced matrimonial department today on 0161 928 3201 to arrange a confidential consultation.

In today’s economic climate, financial market volatility is (unfortunately) no longer the exception, it is the norm. Rising interest rates, inflationary pressures, fluctuating property values, and unpredictable investment returns are now the backdrop against which divorce settlements must be negotiated. For separating couples, this reality introduces an added layer of complexity to an already emotionally and legally challenging process. Courts, legal advisers, and clients alike must consider how economic uncertainty impacts both the fairness and sustainability of financial arrangements.

The Importance of Up-to-Date Valuations

One of the most immediate challenges during periods of market volatility is ensuring that asset valuations are current. Property prices can fluctuate significantly over a matter of months; pensions and other retirement funds are often subject to market performance; and privately owned businesses may be affected by shifts in demand, supply chain issues, or investment sentiment.

Courts increasingly require evidence that reflects the most recent market conditions. Outdated valuations in proceedings risk producing settlements that are unfair to one party and may later require variation or enforcement action. Expert reports from chartered surveyors, actuaries, and forensic accountants are now essential tools in ensuring that valuations are accurate and defensible. Where there is significant time between the valuations and any later hearing, parties engaged in proceedings should anticipate updating valuations to reflect economic realities at the point of decision.

Structuring Payments in Volatile Times

Economic uncertainty can also influence the structure of financial settlements. Traditionally, divorcing couples may agree to lump sum payments to achieve an immediate division of assets. However, in periods of volatility, liquidity constraints can make large, upfront payments difficult or impractical. Courts and advisers are increasingly considering staged or instalment-based arrangements as a pragmatic solution.

Staged payments provide a dual benefit. They protect the paying party from the risk of insolvency or sudden financial difficulty while ensuring the receiving party ultimately receives the amount to which they are entitled. These arrangements may be structured over a period of time, linked to future financial events, or contingent on the sale of property or realisation of investments. While instalments can introduce administrative complexity, they often offer a more sustainable path to fulfilling financial obligations in uncertain times.

Reassessing Maintenance Obligations

Maintenance, whether spousal or child, is another area directly affected by economic volatility. Courts have long recognised that maintenance orders are not fixed indefinitely and can be varied if circumstances change materially. Significant shifts in income, increased living costs, or unexpected financial obligations can all justify applications to adjust previously agreed or ordered payments.

For spousal maintenance, changes in employment, business income, or investment returns may necessitate reconsideration of the amount or duration of payments. For child maintenance, a substantial alteration in either parent’s financial circumstances can similarly trigger the need for variation. Parties should be proactive in reviewing their financial obligations regularly and seeking early legal advice if circumstances change materially. By doing so, they can avoid disputes escalating and reduce the risk of enforcement proceedings.

Balancing Caution with Pragmatism

Advising clients during periods of market volatility requires a delicate balance between caution and pragmatism. On one hand, settlements must be robust enough to withstand financial uncertainty; on the other hand, overly rigid arrangements can create unnecessary conflict or fail to reflect changing realities.

One approach increasingly used by legal advisers is the inclusion of flexibility within agreements. For example, instead of specifying fixed sums for investment portfolios, parties may agree to percentage-based divisions. This ensures that both parties share in the benefits (or bear the burdens) of market fluctuations, reducing the need for later adjustment. Similarly, provisions for adjustment based on specific financial triggers, such as the sale of a property or realisation of a business asset, can make settlements more durable and fair.

The Role of Expert Advice

Expert input is particularly valuable during periods of economic volatility. Financial advisers, actuaries, and accountants can provide scenario modelling, risk assessment, and projections that help parties understand potential outcomes under different market conditions. Courts are likely to place significant weight on expert evidence that demonstrates careful and reasonable consideration of current and anticipated economic circumstances.

Legal advisers also play a critical role in guiding clients through the emotional and strategic dimensions of financial negotiations. Maintaining objectivity, assessing risk, and advising on pragmatic solutions, rather than insisting on ideal outcomes, can help achieve settlements that are both fair and achievable.

Looking Ahead: Durable Solutions in an Unpredictable Economy

The underlying principle for courts and advisers in 2025 remains clear: settlements must serve the long-term interests of both parties while being responsive to changing financial conditions. A settlement that appears fair today may be unsustainable tomorrow if market volatility is not adequately accounted for.

Parties who embrace flexibility whether through staged payments, percentage-based divisions, or review clauses, are often best positioned to achieve outcomes that withstand economic uncertainty. Proactive planning, combined with up-to-date valuations and expert evidence, can mitigate the risk of future disputes and ensure that financial arrangements remain equitable.

In summary, navigating divorce settlements during economic volatility requires careful attention to valuations, payment structures, and maintenance obligations. By adopting a pragmatic and forward-looking approach, supported by expert advice and flexible legal drafting, parties can reduce risk, safeguard their financial interests, and achieve settlements that are durable, fair, and reflective of both current and anticipated circumstances.

If you’d like to explore your options or discuss these issues in further detail, contact our experienced matrimonial department today on 0161 928 3201.

Allegations of parental alienation continue to pose some of the most complex challenges in modern family law. Traditionally understood as a situation where one parent deliberately undermines a child’s relationship with the other parent, parental alienation can have profound consequences for both children and parents. In recent years, the rapid expansion of digital communication has added a new layer of complexity. Children are increasingly exposed to online messaging, social media content, and digital interactions that can subtly (or sometimes overtly) shape their perceptions of a parent. Courts in 2025 are acutely aware of these dynamics and are taking a nuanced approach when assessing claims of parental alienation.

Understanding Patterns, Not Isolated Incidents

One of the most important considerations for courts is the distinction between isolated incidents and patterns of behaviour. A single argument, a fleeting comment, or a one-off social media post is unlikely to amount to parental alienation on its own. The courts are primarily concerned with ongoing, deliberate behaviours that consistently undermine a child’s relationship with the other parent.

Judges will look for evidence that demonstrates a sustained effort to interfere with the parent–child relationship. This might include repeated negative remarks about the other parent, encouraging the child to reject the other parent’s authority, or consistently portraying one parent as unworthy of affection. Courts are trained to differentiate between ordinary conflict that arises during separation or divorce and behaviours that may amount to alienation.

The Child’s Perspective

Central to any consideration of parental alienation is the impact on the child. Courts do not merely assess parental behaviour in isolation; they examine how these behaviours affect the child’s expressed wishes and feelings. A child who consistently expresses fear, reluctance, or hostility towards one parent may be reflecting underlying alienating behaviour.

However, courts are careful to ensure that the child’s views are interpreted within the appropriate context. Children’s opinions can be shaped by age, maturity, and external influences, including peers and social media. This is why independent expert evidence, often in the form of child psychologists or CAFCASS reports, is critical. Such experts can help the court understand the true source of a child’s reluctance to engage with a parent and whether parental alienation may be a contributing factor.

The Role of Technology

In the digital age, technology plays an increasingly significant role in family disputes. WhatsApp messages, social media posts, TikTok videos, and even seemingly innocuous comments on social media platforms can all be scrutinised in court. Parents must be aware that their digital footprint can influence proceedings and that online behaviour is no longer private when disputes escalate.

Courts will consider both the content and frequency of digital communication. Repeated messages that criticise the other parent or encourage negative perceptions may be regarded as evidence of alienating behaviour. Even indirect forms of communication, such as “liking” or sharing content that undermines a parent’s role, can be relevant.

It is important to note that technology can also serve a positive function in demonstrating a parent’s engagement with their child. Thoughtful use of digital communication to maintain contact, particularly when children live apart from a parent, can provide clear evidence of constructive parenting.

Independent Evidence Is Key

The courts are cautious when evaluating allegations of parental alienation. Given the potential consequences for both the child and the accused parent, independent evidence is essential. Expert reports, psychological assessments, and professional observations can help the court distinguish between genuine alienation and normal post-separation adjustment difficulties.

Parents who raise allegations must provide credible, substantiated evidence. Courts are unlikely to rely solely on anecdotal claims or hearsay. Similarly, parents accused of alienating behaviour have the opportunity to respond with their own evidence, highlighting efforts to maintain a positive relationship with the child and minimise conflict.

Navigating Disputes Responsibly

In the context of digital communication, parents must exercise caution. Social media interactions, messaging apps, and even casual comments can inadvertently inflame disputes and strengthen an opposing case of alienation. Maintaining respectful, child-focused communication is crucial.

We would advise that any parent consider the following guidance carefully:

• Avoid negative comments about the other parent in any medium that a child may access.
• Use neutral, constructive language in digital messages.
• Document interactions carefully when disputes arise, to provide clear records without exaggerating or manipulating context.
• Seek professional advice early when allegations of alienation are raised.

Looking Ahead

As family law continues to evolve, courts are placing greater emphasis on understanding the interplay between parental behaviour, technology, and the child.

Ultimately, the court’s primary concern remains the welfare of the child. Allegations of parental alienation are treated with seriousness, but courts strive to balance protection with fairness.

For parents navigating these difficult issues, the guiding principle is clear: focus on the child’s best interests, act responsibly online and offline, and seek professional guidance when disputes arise. By doing so, parents can reduce the risk of alienation claims escalating, preserve the child’s relationship with both parents, and help ensure that the courts receive an accurate and balanced picture of the family dynamics at play.

If you’d like to explore your options or discuss these issues in further detail, contact our experienced matrimonial department today on 0161 928 3201.

The April 2024 reforms to the Family Procedure Rules (FPR) ushered in a cultural shift in family law, emphasising resolution outside the courtroom wherever possible. While the 2022 introduction of no‑fault divorce simplified the legal basis for separation, the 2024 reforms extend that modernisation by embedding mediation, arbitration, and other forms of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) into the very fabric of family proceedings.

Why the changes matter

Historically, divorce proceedings in England and Wales were characterised by an adversarial process. Even when couples wished to keep things amicable, the court system often reinforced a combative approach. No‑fault divorce marked a turning point by allowing couples to separate without apportioning blame. The 2024 reforms build upon this by requiring parties and judges alike to prioritise non‑court solutions. The clear policy message is this: litigation should be a last resort.

What the reforms introduced

The amendments to the FPR created several practical obligations:

• Judicial gatekeeping:

Judges are required to scrutinise what steps parties have taken to resolve matters outside court. If little effort is demonstrated, a judge may adjourn proceedings to allow mediation or arbitration to take place.

• Wider powers to refer:

The court can now formally direct parties toward mediation or other alternative dispute resolution methods if they consider ADR methods appropriate.

• Increased consequences for refusal:

A party who unreasonably refuses ADR may face adverse costs orders. This strengthens the incentive to engage constructively.

Practical consequences for clients

For separating couples, this means preparation is key. Parties should expect to be asked at the first hearing what steps they have taken to explore ADR. Documenting attempts at mediation or explaining clearly why it was unsuitable is essential. Judges are increasingly robust in questioning those who insist on litigation without justification.

Mediation carries both financial and reputational incentives. A couple who resolve matters through mediation may save substantial legal costs and often preserve a better long‑term relationship, especially where children are involved. By contrast, parties who refuse without sound reasons, risk both delay and judicial disapproval.

When mediation is not suitable

Of course, mediation is not always appropriate. Where there is domestic abuse, significant power imbalance, or entrenched dishonesty, court intervention remains vital. The key for clients is to prepare evidence to explain why ADR was unsuitable in those circumstances. For example, records of police involvement or evidence of financial concealment can justify proceeding directly to court. Solicitors play an important role in framing these reasons clearly to avoid criticism.

Strategic advice for clients

• Begin ADR discussions early: Even one mediation session can demonstrate willingness to engage.
• Keep records: Written evidence of invitations to mediate, solicitor correspondence, or mediator reports can be invaluable in court.
• Be pragmatic: ADR is not about winning or losing; it is about achieving a workable solution that avoids the financial and emotional costs of trial.
• Think child‑first: Where children are involved, judges strongly expect parties to protect them from conflict. Showing willingness to mediate aligns with this expectation.

Conclusion
The April 2024 FPR reforms represent more than a procedural update; they mark a cultural transformation. Litigation is no longer the default pathway. Couples embarking on financial remedy proceedings must recognise the central role of ADR and approach it with genuine commitment. Those who do so stand to benefit not only in cost savings but also in preserving dignity, relationships, and control over their futures.

For clients uncertain about how these reforms affect them, early legal advice is crucial. Tailored guidance ensures that attempts at mediation are properly recorded, that unsuitable cases are carefully justified, and that overall strategy aligns with both the letter and spirit of the law. With the right preparation, parties can navigate this new landscape effectively, resolving disputes more quickly, more affordably, and, often, more amicably.

If you’d like to explore your options or discuss these issues in further detail, contact our experienced matrimonial department today on 0161 928 3201.

The long shadow of COVID‑19 continues to affect families, even years after the height of the pandemic. With the start of the new school year, many separated parents face questions about how best to support children who are still adjusting to educational gaps, and social anxieties.

The pandemic reshaped parenting, forcing families to adapt to remote schooling, shifting work arrangements, and heightened mental health concerns. Now, as children return to more stable routines, separated parents must ask whether their existing child arrangements still meet the needs of their children.

A parenting plan or order made in 2020 or 2021 may not reflect a child’s current academic, social, or therapeutic requirements. It is crucial for parents to review agreements to ensure they remain practical and centred on the child’s welfare.

Review arrangements

Court orders and parenting plans agreed years ago may no longer be workable. For example, one parent may live further from school after a move prompted by the pandemic. Transport and homework commitments must be carefully balanced. Where disputes arise, mediation and solicitor negotiation offer a constructive platform to update schedules.

Focus on mental health

Anxiety around school transitions remains common. Many children continue to struggle with social reintegration, exam pressure, etc. Courts expect parents to demonstrate sensitivity and to support therapeutic intervention where required. A parent who dismisses a child’s mental health needs risks judicial criticism when welfare is assessed.

Updating Arrangements

For parents unable to reach agreement, options include revisiting child arrangements orders, engaging child‑inclusive mediation, or in some cases making urgent applications to court. Ultimately, the welfare of the child remains paramount, and arrangements must evolve to reflect today’s realities.

If you’d like to explore your options or discuss these issues in further detail, contact our experienced matrimonial department today on 0161 928 3201.

More couples than ever are choosing to live together without marrying. In fact, cohabiting couples are now the fastest-growing family type in the UK, according to the latest data from the Office for National Statistics. But while society has evolved, the law hasn’t kept pace, and that gap is leaving many people vulnerable.

One of the most enduring myths in family law is the idea of a “common law marriage.” Despite how often we hear it, it simply doesn’t exist. There is no automatic legal protection for unmarried couples, no matter how long you’ve lived together, whether you’ve raised children, or how much you’ve contributed financially. That reality comes as a shock to many of our clients, often at the very moment they need protection the most.

For example, if a cohabiting partner isn’t named on the title deeds of the family home, they may have no automatic right to remain there or to claim any share of its value on separation, even if they’ve been contributing towards the mortgage and household bills for years. The law does not always recognise those contributions in the same way it does within marriage. In some cases, individuals find themselves effectively homeless and facing a complex legal battle to try to establish any interest in the property at all.

And while married couples may be entitled to spousal maintenance, cohabiting partners have no such protection. This can be especially unjust where one person has stepped away from their career to raise children or support the household. In the context of divorce, courts recognise that as a contribution worthy of financial redress. For cohabiting couples? The law largely looks the other way.

The issue is not always about conflict. Many couples begin with shared intentions and mutual trust. But without clear, formal documentation, those intentions may carry little weight if the relationship breaks down. Good faith at the start of a relationship isn’t always enough when it comes to complex matters like property ownership, finances, or childcare arrangements on separation.

The good news is that there are clear, proactive steps couples can take. A Cohabitation Agreement allows you to set out what should happen if the relationship ends. It’s a flexible, legally binding document that can cover property rights, financial contributions, and other key arrangements. We’re seeing a growing number of thoughtful, forward-looking couples taking this step; not out of mistrust, but out of a desire for clarity and fairness.

The law may not yet reflect the realities of modern relationships, but you don’t have to wait for it to catch up. If you’re living with a partner, or planning to move in together, don’t rely on assumptions or internet myths. Speak to a family law specialist who can give you sound, tailored advice. We regularly help clients put robust, practical protections in place so they can enjoy their relationships with confidence, not confusion.

If you’d like to explore your options or discuss a Cohabitation Agreement, contact our matrimonial department today on 0161 928 3201.

The long summer holidays can be a joyful time for children - full of sunshine, travel, and a break from school routines. But for separated or divorced parents, this period often brings a great deal of stress, particularly when trying to agree on who the children should be with, and when.

We regularly advise parents who find themselves at odds over summer holiday arrangements. These disputes can surface even where term-time contact has been working smoothly.

Holiday plans, work schedules, and differing expectations frequently lead to tension. Both parents understandably want to make the most of this time with their children, and finding a fair solution isn’t always straightforward.

It is important to recognise that holiday arrangements are not always dictated by term-time patterns and the Family Court expect parents to take a fair and balanced approach, keeping the children’s best interests at the centre of any discussions. Where international travel is involved – even just for a short break - written consent from the other parent is (in most cases) essential. Without it, the travelling parent could find themselves facing serious legal consequences.

If parents cannot reach agreement, there are various circumstances wherein the Family Court can be asked to intervene. However, we always encourage early resolution, whether through solicitor-led negotiation or mediation. This not only reduces conflict but can often avoid the need for court involvement altogether.

Our strong advice is not to leave discussions about the holidays to the last minute. The sooner a potential issue is identified, the greater the range of options available to resolve it quickly and effectively.

If this summer is proving difficult and agreement seems out of reach, we are here to help. Contact our matrimonial department today on 0161 928 3201.

As wedding season begins, couples across England and Wales are preparing for their big day. Amidst the excitement of dress fittings, venue bookings, and guest lists, financial planning may not seem like the most romantic topic. However, discussing a prenuptial agreement ("pre-nup") can be a wise step for those looking to safeguard their financial future. While some view pre-nups as an unromantic or controlling measure, others see them as a practical way to provide clarity and protection in case the unexpected happens.

Understanding Pre-Nups in England and Wales

A prenuptial agreement is a formal contract entered into before marriage, outlining how assets and finances will be divided in the event of divorce. Although not automatically binding, courts are giving significant weight to nuptial agreements, particularly where both parties have entered into them freely, with full disclosure and legal advice.

Why Consider a Pre-Nup?

While discussing a potential break-up before the wedding day may feel uncomfortable, there are several reasons why a pre-nup can be a wise decision:

1. Protecting Pre-Marital Assets:

If one party has substantial assets, a business, or inherited wealth, a pre-nup can help ensure these remain protected.

2. Safeguarding Children from Previous Relationships:

Individuals with children from previous relationships may use a pre-nup to ring-fence assets for their children's future.

3. Clarifying Financial Expectations:

A well-drafted agreement can help both parties manage expectations, reducing the likelihood of disputes if the marriage ends.

4. Avoiding Costly Litigation:

A pre-nup can streamline divorce proceedings, potentially saving time, stress, and legal costs.

Contrary to common misconceptions, prenuptial agreements are not about control or distrust — they are about financial clarity and fairness. A well-structured prenup helps both partners enter marriage with clear expectations, ensuring neither is left in financial hardship in the event of unforeseen circumstances.

To be legally valid, a prenuptial agreement must be signed at least 28 days before the wedding, allowing ample time for reflection and independent legal advice. This safeguard reinforces the principle that no one should feel pressured into an agreement. Both parties must fully disclose their finances and obtain independent legal advice to ensure they understand the implications.

If you are considering a prenuptial agreement as part of your wedding preparations, or wish to understand how your upcoming marriage will affect your financial position, seeking expert legal advice is crucial. For guidance tailored to your circumstances, contact our team on 0161 928 3201.

When a marriage breaks down, emotions often take centre stage. But for many, the practical reality quickly follows: what happens to the wealth, property, and lifestyle you have worked hard to build?

For individuals with complex or substantial assets, the process of separation is about far more than numbers. It is about securing your future, safeguarding any business interests, and preserving what matters most.

In England and Wales, there are two main ways to resolve financial matters following a separation: reaching a settlement by consent or pursuing financial remedy proceedings through the court. Both have their place, and both require careful consideration – especially where the financial landscape is intricate or sophisticated in nature.

Settlement by Consent: A Discreet, Tailored Route

For many high-net-worth individuals, reaching an agreement outside of court is the preferred option. Whether through solicitor-led negotiation, mediation, or arbitration, this route offers flexibility, privacy, and the ability to maintain control over the outcome of your hard-earned assets.

When handled properly, a negotiated settlement can be every bit as robust as a court-imposed resolution. Settlement by consent allows for creative structuring, accommodates complex asset types, and often reduces the time, emotional strain, and expense of litigation.

However, this approach still requires meticulous preparation. Full financial disclosure, expert valuations, and strategic thinking are essential to ensure the final agreement is not only fair, but future-proof.

Financial Remedy Proceedings: When Court Becomes Necessary

Despite best efforts, not all cases can be resolved through negotiation. If there are disputes over the value of assets, concerns about non-disclosure, or simply a breakdown in communication, court proceedings may be the best – or only – option.

Financial remedy proceedings provide a structured process with judicial oversight. For some, particularly where significant assets or offshore structures are involved, this can provide certainty and resolution. It is also a forum where more complex legal arguments such as contributions, needs, or pre-marital wealth, can be properly tested.

While more formal, this route ensures that your position is protected, even in the most challenging of circumstances.

Choosing the Right Path

Both routes can lead to fair and effective outcomes. The key is understanding which is right for you, and when. In many cases, a well-advised attempt at settlement should be the starting point, but having the strength and strategy to pivot to litigation if needed is equally important.

How We Can Help

At Hill and Company Solicitors, we understand that clients’ financial circumstances demand a bespoke approach. Whether you are looking to resolve matters amicably or require robust representation in court, we can help you navigate the process with clarity, discretion, and confidence.

If you are considering divorce or separation and want to understand your options, contact our matrimonial department today on 0161 928 3201.

As the Easter holidays approach, we understand that this can be a challenging time for parents. Balancing work commitments while ensuring children are cared for and entertained can feel overwhelming — especially if your children attend different schools with conflicting holiday dates. Adding a co-parenting dynamic into the mix can make things even more complex, particularly when it comes to agreeing on schedules and financial responsibilities.

To reduce stress and avoid last-minute conflicts, we strongly encourage parents to discuss and agree on both practical arrangements and financial contributions in advance.

The fundamental legal principle is that children have the right to spend time with both parents. The law adopts a flexible approach to accommodate the unique circumstances of each family, allowing judges to tailor arrangements to fit specific situations. However, in co-parenting scenarios without a court order, this broad guidance can create uncertainty, making it challenging for parents to determine what is fair and appropriate. Unfortunately, this often results in misunderstandings or disagreements regarding the time children spend with each parent.

Tips for a Smooth Easter Holiday Co-Parenting Plan

To help ease the process, here are a few practical steps you can take:

1. Plan Early:

Discuss holiday arrangements well in advance to allow time for adjustments if needed.

2. Be Clear on Financial Contributions:

Agree on how holiday expenses, such as activity clubs or days out, will be shared to prevent disagreements.

3. Prioritise the Children’s Needs:

Keep the focus on what will work best for the children, ensuring they have quality time with both parents, where appropriate.

4. Communicate Effectively:

Keep discussions respectful and solution-focused, using written communication if verbal conversations tend to escalate.

5. Consider a Written Agreement:

Even a simple written plan can help clarify expectations and avoid confusion.

If you have any questions about making arrangements for your children over the school holidays—or at any other time of the year—our team is here to help. Contact us at 0161 928 3201 for guidance and support tailored to your situation.